Just a reminder guys: all sessions with me are paid for in advance. There are no exceptions. And no, buying a clip doesn't count as payment for a session, it counts of payment for a clip. One of the biggest draw backs of my highly successful blackmail videos is that you morons find it necessary to announce to me when you decide to buy and/or watch them. I really don't give a shit. Nor do I care for the email you may or may not send. In fact, I care NOTHING about you unless I'm profiting from you in someway. Not the "promise" of profit. Actual profit. Immediately and up front. Why? Because I make 6 figures a year without wasting my time.
Unless you have a fetish for cordial agreeableness, your sad attempts to illicit a reaction will fail.
Loser: Hello Goddess Ceara
Ceara Lynch: yes?
Loser:
I am watching your, Princess Rene, and Princess Monique's blackmail video
Ceara Lynch: so?
Loser: am currently filling out email
Ceara Lynch: and?
Loser: I just want to make sure this is all fantasy right?
Ceara Lynch: fill it out and find out
Loser: I am a little scared
Ceara Lynch: dont waste my time
Loser: ok I will finish watching and filling
Loser: FUCK MONIQUE'S WHISPERING
Loser: IF YOU USE ANY OF THAT I'LL SUE
Loser: DO NOT OPEN IT
Ceara Lynch: huh?
Loser: do not open that email
Loser: please
Ceara Lynch: what email?
Loser: blackmail email I sent after watcihng
Ceara Lynch: oh ok
Ceara Lynch: bye
Loser: what?
Ceara Lynch: i said "ok bye."
Loser: why
Ceara Lynch: Uh, because this conversation is over
Loser: I know you checked you dumb whore
Loser: how was that empty inbox
Ceara Lynch: ok
Loser: fuck off
Ceara Lynch: will do
Ceara Lynch: bye
Offline: Loser has signed out.
For years you were known as the easiest domme to troll a cheap thrill out of. Assuming the name you left in is real, your post is actually proof things haven’t changed. Your arrogance stage usually precedes your rectal lining being peeled off someone’s steel toe boot.
Oops, thanks for the heads up. Fixed.
Doubtful when considering he has a blackmail fetish, it was obviously proofread, and your history. Your loser love letters page is still free content on one of your sites and that specifically encourages trolls to email you and you reward them with free exposure.
Really now, if you think I wrote this entry to “expose” a guy who cared so much about his (fake) information that he messaged me using a full name, I think you’re missing the point entirely.
As for hate mail, you’re right, I do love it and encourage it. Email me some contact@cearalynch.com
For years you were known as the easiest domme to troll a cheap thrill out of. Assuming the name you left in is real, your post is actually proof things haven’t changed. Your arrogance stage usually precedes your rectal lining being peeled off someone’s steel toe boot.
Oops, thanks for the heads up. Fixed.
Doubtful when considering he has a blackmail fetish, it was obviously proofread, and your history. Your loser love letters page is still free content on one of your sites and that specifically encourages trolls to email you and you reward them with free exposure.
Really now, if you think I wrote this entry to “expose” a guy who cared so much about his (fake) information that he messaged me using a full name, I think you’re missing the point entirely.
As for hate mail, you’re right, I do love it and encourage it. Email me some contact@cearalynch.com
Then you’ll be deleting the bulk of the emails on your loser love
letter page cause most of them are blackmail bait and self
eviscerating subs looking for public humiliation.
maybe if you want to restrict it to hate mail you will also want to
change the wording of your solicitation “They range everywhere from
sissybois begging Me to whore them out on craigslist to human toilets
telling me how many tons of shit they’ve eaten over the years. If you
have something pathetic and degrading you’d like to confess and have
exposed”
No need to thank me for the heads up, i know how time consuming that is for you.
Yeah I do think you intentionally left his name in. maybe because you
are a self confessed drama lover, maybe because you have always loved
inciting a reaction, maybe to trigger a response in your blackmail
fans. who knows? makes more sense to me than a very bright and
calculated woman who never seems to miss a grammatical edit would repeatedly
make her ooopsies on the same privacy issues that had your former blog
deleted.
My main point anyway is how you of all people could act like you are
above being trolled. Your learning curve was nearly half a decade not
one week and if the right pressure is applied you can easily be forced
to respond or driven back into hiatus.
Im not sure what your beef is with that quote. Lots of guys like to be “exposed.” One would assume an invitation to be exposed would result in just that, right? No rewording necessary.
This entry isn’t about trolling, its about a very typical game guys like to play to have their fetish indulged for free. That’s fine if you want to think I intentionally put his name in there, I guess I have no way of proving otherwise. But don’t you see how your accusations contradict the whole point here? Why would I “blackmail” someone for free in an entry where I’m saying, “stop trying to illicit free blackmail?”
My previous journal was deleted for posting a name exactly as it was written as a screen name, and exactly as it was written on the person’s domain name (theirname.com) It’s clear to me that LJ has very strict rules about posting names, even if it’s a name that the person is desperately trying to promote elsewhere online. Being the bright, calculated woman that I am, why would I assume that risk again? Making a new journal and reposting all my previous entries is a shit ton of work (even if I make someone else do it) I just don’t see the benefit.
Yes, in this context trolling means guys who try to provoke dommes to receive free abuse.
You are justifying the free abuse on your loser love letter page while
this journal entry is a general complaint about guys who try to play
you for free abuse.
Is the difference that these guys took you up on your offer, came to
you and explicitly gave you permission to post their correspondence?
Despite your claim, that page was not originally part of your website.
It appeared one day with maybe 30 freakshow emails on display. Some
of those emails were on your myspace blog and the emails you showcased
to the masses in your Vice article had nothing to do with blackmail or
public humiliation.
Let’s be honest. You posted that shit without seeking consent because
you could. Try posting them on LJ and watch how many of them report
you. Godaddy will only remove content if they are threatened with a
lawsuit and exactly how many of those guys really want their online
shenanigans on public record. Almost all of those emails were intended to be private, some in your vice article in total good faith, and you exploited them for page hits. You did it because you thought that’s what a domme does and as it became the go to place on your website you rationalized justifications for its existence.
Then you’ll be deleting the bulk of the emails on your loser love
letter page cause most of them are blackmail bait and self
eviscerating subs looking for public humiliation.
maybe if you want to restrict it to hate mail you will also want to
change the wording of your solicitation “They range everywhere from
sissybois begging Me to whore them out on craigslist to human toilets
telling me how many tons of shit they’ve eaten over the years. If you
have something pathetic and degrading you’d like to confess and have
exposed”
No need to thank me for the heads up, i know how time consuming that is for you.
Yeah I do think you intentionally left his name in. maybe because you
are a self confessed drama lover, maybe because you have always loved
inciting a reaction, maybe to trigger a response in your blackmail
fans. who knows? makes more sense to me than a very bright and
calculated woman who never seems to miss a grammatical edit would repeatedly
make her ooopsies on the same privacy issues that had your former blog
deleted.
My main point anyway is how you of all people could act like you are
above being trolled. Your learning curve was nearly half a decade not
one week and if the right pressure is applied you can easily be forced
to respond or driven back into hiatus.
Im not sure what your beef is with that quote. Lots of guys like to be “exposed.” One would assume an invitation to be exposed would result in just that, right? No rewording necessary.
This entry isn’t about trolling, its about a very typical game guys like to play to have their fetish indulged for free. That’s fine if you want to think I intentionally put his name in there, I guess I have no way of proving otherwise. But don’t you see how your accusations contradict the whole point here? Why would I “blackmail” someone for free in an entry where I’m saying, “stop trying to illicit free blackmail?”
My previous journal was deleted for posting a name exactly as it was written as a screen name, and exactly as it was written on the person’s domain name (theirname.com) It’s clear to me that LJ has very strict rules about posting names, even if it’s a name that the person is desperately trying to promote elsewhere online. Being the bright, calculated woman that I am, why would I assume that risk again? Making a new journal and reposting all my previous entries is a shit ton of work (even if I make someone else do it) I just don’t see the benefit.
Yes, in this context trolling means guys who try to provoke dommes to receive free abuse.
You are justifying the free abuse on your loser love letter page while
this journal entry is a general complaint about guys who try to play
you for free abuse.
Is the difference that these guys took you up on your offer, came to
you and explicitly gave you permission to post their correspondence?
Despite your claim, that page was not originally part of your website.
It appeared one day with maybe 30 freakshow emails on display. Some
of those emails were on your myspace blog and the emails you showcased
to the masses in your Vice article had nothing to do with blackmail or
public humiliation.
Let’s be honest. You posted that shit without seeking consent because
you could. Try posting them on LJ and watch how many of them report
you. Godaddy will only remove content if they are threatened with a
lawsuit and exactly how many of those guys really want their online
shenanigans on public record. Almost all of those emails were intended to be private, some in your vice article in total good faith, and you exploited them for page hits. You did it because you thought that’s what a domme does and as it became the go to place on your website you rationalized justifications for its existence.
illicit vs. elicit
re. use of illicit: while you are a busy woman, I don’t know what response you wish to elicit whilst engaging in what some might see as illicit enterprise: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/illicit (definition 2) and using not quite a homophone (illicit sounds like elicit) – coming from someone who is famously not a homophobe (homophobe would not be confused with homophone) and while we are here can I give a big shout to http://www.fallacyfiles.org/taxonomy.html which contains the links to fallacies, illicit minor and illicit major and which may be used to categorize some of the pitfalls of your subscribers’ reasining. Loving your stuff btw. – p
Re: illicit vs. elicit
Ouch, that kinda stung.
Re: illicit vs. elicit
very sorry, that wasn’t my intention (reasining ! – how’s my proof reading?) you are an uber-intellect and it is appreciated, really. Sorry again, I just like playing with words. – p
Re: illicit vs. elicit
No worries, I kid. Anything that makes me a better reader and writer is much obliged.
illicit vs. elicit
re. use of illicit: while you are a busy woman, I don’t know what response you wish to elicit whilst engaging in what some might see as illicit enterprise: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/illicit (definition 2) and using not quite a homophone (illicit sounds like elicit) – coming from someone who is famously not a homophobe (homophobe would not be confused with homophone) and while we are here can I give a big shout to http://www.fallacyfiles.org/taxonomy.html which contains the links to fallacies, illicit minor and illicit major and which may be used to categorize some of the pitfalls of your subscribers’ reasining. Loving your stuff btw. – p
Re: illicit vs. elicit
Ouch, that kinda stung.
Re: illicit vs. elicit
very sorry, that wasn’t my intention (reasining ! – how’s my proof reading?) you are an uber-intellect and it is appreciated, really. Sorry again, I just like playing with words. – p
Re: illicit vs. elicit
No worries, I kid. Anything that makes me a better reader and writer is much obliged.
“Well that would be a damn good page”
“Would” be? I’ve had that page since I’ve had a website.
“Well that would be a damn good page”
“Would” be? I’ve had that page since I’ve had a website.
Why would I be giving tedious and pointless instructions to someone who isn’t my property and is proving himself to be a complete contradiction to what he was just apologizing for? Fuck off until you’ve proven yourself useful.
http://www.cearalynch.com/content/tribute-page
Why would I be giving tedious and pointless instructions to someone who isn’t my property and is proving himself to be a complete contradiction to what he was just apologizing for? Fuck off until you’ve proven yourself useful.
http://www.cearalynch.com/content/tribute-page
“blackmail email I sent after watcihng” Why are there so many morons on the the Internet who speak like that? They’re the type of people who initiate an internet conversation with “Hello friend”. Take your pidgin English and fuck right off, you stupid, illiterate cock.
“blackmail email I sent after watcihng” Why are there so many morons on the the Internet who speak like that? They’re the type of people who initiate an internet conversation with “Hello friend”. Take your pidgin English and fuck right off, you stupid, illiterate cock.